CDC Firings Undermine Public Health Work Far Beyond Washington

Tags: Public Health, CDC, Government Policy, Infectious Diseases, Health Workforce


Impact on Public Health Workforce

The abrupt dismissal of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) employees has significantly disrupted training programs that have long supported state and local public health departments. These programs not only cultivate future public health leaders but also play a vital role in disease control efforts nationwide.

Essential Contributions of Terminated Employees

Many of the terminated CDC staff were involved in crucial public health operations, such as responding to outbreaks of dengue fever, flu, and tuberculosis. Their responsibilities included virus testing, ensuring compliance with federal lab regulations, monitoring tuberculosis cases, and providing health education to prevent sexually transmitted infections.

One such example is Gaël Cruanes, a former CDC public health adviser in New York City. His role involved screening newly arrived immigrants and refugees for tuberculosis. According to Cruanes, these efforts were essential for public safety, and the terminations were both sudden and detrimental to public health efforts.

Government Response and Reversal

The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) declined to comment on the situation, while the CDC and White House remained silent. The staff reductions primarily targeted probationary employees who had been hired within the past two years and lacked civil service protections.

Following widespread backlash, some of the terminated employees were reinstated on March 4, with official emails acknowledging the disruption caused by their dismissals. This reversal followed a federal judge’s ruling that the firings were likely unlawful.

Impact on State and Local Health Departments

The Public Health Associate Program, established in 2007, has placed 1,800 professionals in nearly every state and U.S. territory. Local health officials expressed concerns over the abrupt terminations, which left them scrambling to cover critical functions.

In Long Beach, California, the dismissals affected three associate program participants. These individuals had been key members of the city’s public health team, working on sexually transmitted infection surveillance and outbreak response in hospitals, nursing homes, restaurants, and schools. City health officer Anissa Davis emphasized their importance, stating that public health is consistently under-resourced, making these positions invaluable.

Consequences for Public Health Laboratories

The CDC’s Laboratory Leadership Service program, launched in 2015 to improve lab safety and quality, also suffered significant staff reductions. Sixteen of its 24 fellows were terminated. These doctorate-level scientists were instrumental in supporting underfunded and understaffed public health laboratories.

Lab fellows had been involved in outbreak investigations and training local staff in diagnostic testing. Their contributions included setting up a new test in Florida to detect Oropouche virus, a little-known but emerging insect-borne disease, and assisting American Samoa in testing for dengue fever. Their absence leaves a significant gap in outbreak preparedness and response capabilities.

Questionable Justifications for Termination

Documents indicate that all dismissed employees received identical termination letters citing poor performance. However, memos from supervisors contradict these claims, confirming that many of the affected individuals were in good standing. Some, like Cruanes, had not even undergone their first performance review before being dismissed.

Challenges in Maintaining Public Health Programs

Local health departments are now struggling to manage essential services with reduced personnel. In Minneapolis, a CDC public health adviser had been providing sexual and reproductive health education in high schools while also working on STI testing citywide. The loss of this position has forced the city’s public health department to reassign responsibilities in a rushed and inefficient manner.

Health officials warn that the dismantling of these training programs threatens the long-term stability of the public health workforce. The CDC’s programs have been instrumental in fostering expertise and experience in public health, and their abrupt termination could have lasting consequences for disease control efforts across the country.


This article was produced by KFF Health News, a national newsroom that specializes in in-depth journalism on health issues. KFF is an independent source for health policy research, polling, and journalism.


Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *