#MedicaidWorkRequirements #BenefitCliff #HealthInsuranceAccess #MedicaidFraudDebate #LowIncomeWorkers #AffordableCareActGaps
Struggling to Stay Afloat While Working Full-Time
In Missoula, Montana, James—who asked to use only his middle name—clocks out after eight-hour shifts at a sandwich shop, then tries to coax his aging car home. Despite holding steady work and making progress in addiction recovery, James finds himself in an impossible position: earn too much and lose Medicaid, or fudge the numbers to stay insured.
The dilemma stems from a raise of about $1 an hour, pushing him just $50 a week over Montana’s Medicaid income limit of roughly $21,000 per year. That small increase disqualifies him from life-saving coverage, including prescription medications for alcohol dependence, bipolar disorder, and insomnia.
“I only saw one option,” James said. “Fudge the numbers.”
Not the Fraud Targeted by Politicians
Congressional Republicans have claimed Medicaid is plagued by fraud, justifying new work requirements and stricter eligibility rules. But James doesn’t fit the image of the “lazy fraudster” often painted in political debates. He’s a recovering alcoholic, an employed taxpayer, and a part-time student working toward certification as an addiction counselor.
“I don’t want to be a fraud. I don’t want to die,” he said. “Those shouldn’t be the only two options.”
Medicaid’s Benefit Cliff Leaves Workers in Limbo
James’s story highlights a broader issue: the “benefit cliff.” A modest pay raise can push low-income workers out of Medicaid without giving them enough to afford private insurance or cover out-of-pocket medical costs. For James, even the cheapest Affordable Care Act plans or job-based insurance would leave him unable to afford critical medications, one of which alone costs $60 a month.
Experts say these cliffs discourage progress. Pamela Herd, a public policy professor, noted that losing all coverage due to a tiny raise “just doesn’t make any sense.”
From Recovery to Risk: Why Medicaid Still Matters
James is in recovery, working, and taking classes to help others. Yet, he remains trapped by a system that penalizes stability. In 2023, Montana eliminated its 12-month continuous Medicaid eligibility, now requiring enrollees to report income changes within 10 days—making James’s situation technically fraudulent.
He worries constantly about losing coverage: “Every time I get a piece of mail, I am terrified that I’m gonna open it up and it’s gonna say I don’t have Medicaid anymore.”
New Federal Rules Add More Pressure
President Trump’s July 4 budget law added work and education requirements to Medicaid eligibility and mandates reporting every six months. Health experts warn this will worsen coverage gaps for workers with fluctuating hours or chronic health issues.
“This is going to be a nightmare,” said Pamela Herd. The new policy, she added, moves the system further away from flexibility and fairness, pushing more people like James into untenable choices.
Fighting for a Future, One Prescription at a Time
James wants to contribute. He believes in hard work and helping others. But without health insurance, he fears losing his job, sobriety, and even his life. For now, he continues to work—and continues to hide his pay raise—hoping the system won’t catch up before he gets a chance to escape poverty for good.
Leave a Reply